Like with my music list, I’m not gonna number these, and there isn’t a specific number I’ve chosen. These are just the notable movies from the past year, and what I thought about them.
Here we go –
A movie that exceeded expectations and sat with me a for a few days after seeing it, “Adventureland” was the coming of age story that came out of nowhere. Marketed as a a la Superbad (from same director of) and staring Bill Hader, it did have comedy and it did have Bill Hader, but most of the comedy stemmed from Hader and his comic relief boss role, probably only 10-15 minutes of screen time all together. The real movie follows James (Jesse Eisenberg) and his quest to find a summer job after leaving school. He gets a job at an amusement park, and meets an interesting cast of characters, including Kristen Stewart’s Emily. After they start hanging out, he falls for her, but she’s involved in a secret relationship with Ryan Reynolds’ Mike, who’s the cool guy “veteran” of Adventureland. So there’s a love story, a lot of drama and a well done, set-in-the-80’s movie (that’s not an 80’s movie) in there, which all make it a great watch. After seeing it in theaters, I was convinced I wanted to write a coming of age romance.
500 Days of Summer
I picked the soundtrack in my music list, but the movie itself was one of the movies that stayed with me the longest this year. It was one of those movies that shatters the viewer’s expectations of storytelling and love stories in general. As the voiceover in the beginning says, it’s a movie about boy meets girl, but not a love story. And it’s true. The time-jump storytelling may confuse at first, but is presented in such a way that you come in at important parts of both the initial meeting and hook-up of these two characters, and the turning point/big break up, then moves forward from one point, and backward from the other, then forward again. Actually, that does sound confusing, but the movie makes it work. Also, the editing is great, from the look of the days countdown, to the flashbacks and intercutting stories. Good example is the “Expectations vs. Reality” scene. After seeing this, my “Adventureland” inspired romance story went in the can. I was convinced love stories are stupid. It’s amazing how one movie’s message can completely destroy another’s message, while not taking anything away from the previous movie.
Another Jesee Eisenberg movie ending in “-land,” this one was great comedic take on the zombie movie. Eisenberg’s “Columbus” narrates the film, introducing his rules for survival in a zombie apocalypse. He runs into 3 other survivors – Woody Harrelson’s “Tallahassee,” Emma Stone’s “Wichita,” and Abigrail Breslin’s “Little Rock.” Everyone’s named after where they’re from, because one of the rules is to not really trust anyone in this apocalypse. Best part of the movie, aside from the general comedy stemming from the character interactions (especially Eisenberg and Harrelson) was the cameo from Bill Murray, and the hilarity that ensued from that – Harrelson dressing up like the Ghostbusters, he wearing the real outfit and gun, Murray using a vacuum cleaner. Heard that the writer’s originally did not have him in the script, but Harrelson pulled some strings and he was on board right away. He even came up with the idea of pretending to be a zombie, but not actually being one.
An independant, seemingly big-budget movie produced by but not directed by Peter Jackson, from South Africa, this movie stunned millions when it came out. An alien story with a strong Apartheid allegory not so subtly dipped in, it follows a field operative nacmed Wikus van de Merwe, as he heads the project of informing the alien “prawns” that they will have to evacuate their current living situation, in “District 9,” into a heavily secured concentration camp. He gets in over his head when he runs into a more intelligent prawn named Christopher Johnson, who’s spaceship chemicals spray onto Wikus, and start to change him into a prawn himself. A well-done film with a compelling storyline and great visual effects, I really enjoyed the out-of-the-box take on the alien invasion story. Not only are these aliens not on earth to take over, but the humans are in charge and forcing the aliens around. The marketing for the movie was very innovative as well – placing “humans only” warnings on billboards, bus stop benches, etc.
Probably the most outrageous, if not the best comedy of the year, it follows 4 friends on a Vegas bachelor party went awry. The best part of the movie is that we don’t see the actions of the night, because our main characters have forgotten all about it – we follow them as they piece together the ridiculous puzzle of their out-of-control night in Vegas. Anything that could have gone wrong did go wrong, and in the most bizarre of ways – Asian gangsters, bengal tigers, tooth pulling, marrying strippers, and of course some card-counting and gambling. This is one of those “only in the movies” type stories, and we’re all thankful for that denotation.
A Quentin Tarantino World War II movie about Jews who kill Nazis? Where do I sign up? I read the script last year, and although it took about 3 1/2 hours to read, it was a compelling and exciting. The movie was even more so, with great performances by Christoph Walsh as Colonel Landa, and Mélanie Laurent as Shoshana, the jewish girl who escaped from Landa’s grasp in the first scene of the movie, now disguising as a French theater-owner, and great action sequences that only can be the work of Mr. Tarantino. Another Tarantino-esque aspect of the film is the intertwining storylines – these Nazi-killing “Basterds,” and Shoshana, both plan to destroy the Nazi party by blowing up Shoshana’s theater, where a German Movie night is planned by Joseph Goebbels, the Nazi propanadist minister. Needless to say, it has a great payoff in the end, and hopefully gives all Nazi-hating theater-goers a big smile on their face as the final minutes of the film play out.
Just saw this last night, I was blown away by the visuals – especially in IMAX 3D. The story was compelling and kept you interested the whole time, but the real story was the technology and the CGI imagery used throughout. It is definitely the future of movie-making and viewing, however cost, availability and delivery methods will be make the transition a bit slower. I loved how realistic the Na’vi’s were, especially in facial features. The 3D looked amazing, but especially on some shots – the strong perspective of the sleeping chambers at the beginning, the pop up computer screens on the ships, and even Jake Sully’s video log. You can tell James Cameron put ever bit of hard work he and his company has into the 15 years this movie had been in the making. A visual masterpiece, and definitely the most mesmerizing movie-going experience I had all year.
Also wanted to say a quick thanks to everyone who’s visited the site over the last couple months. It’s already at over 900 views, and I’ve gotten some great responses from a handful of family and friends. Look for more reviews and more personal essays in 2010. Happy New Year everyone!